I like your analysis and I do believe having a diverse student body is important to everyone as we all bring different ideas to the table.
In looking at LSAT scores research has shown that minority groups score lower because of lack of preparation. That's it it boils down to these applicants not having the resources to take prep courses and when they do invest in prep course they are usually a weekend class. Most resort to doing minimal home study thinking that will improve their score. Which over the years it has helped but their counterparts have discovered that if you invest 6 months to a year you can score up to 180. In essence white students have learned to master the test. LSAC is becoming increasing aware of this and this why the last three exams have been harder.
So as minority students scores have gone up,so has the majority scores! So how do we help minority students prepare better for the LSAT? How do they get the financial resources to properly prepare for the LSAT? These are the questions that I wonder about.
Lastly, for those who say if the score is not high enough just don't accept them- they probably won't graduate- All studies have shown once in Law School minority law students graduate and pass the bar at the same rates as white law students.
In closing I'm an African-American female and my LSAT score went from 136 to 172 over the course of 4 months. I had the financial means to take
6 months off of work and focus on the LSAT, applications and so forth. My husband , also African- American, attended law school from 04-07 and now is a successful attorney. He passed the Illinois Bar the first time and he scored a 147 on his LSAT. He did not take a prep course because we could not afford it at the time.
I say this only because there is a tendency to place too much value on these test as future predictors. What we really should be evaluating is the whole person and their experiences in school and work. Law Schools want diversity but more importantly they want their stats to remain high.
