Pheezer
Jr. Member

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 68
|
 |
« on: December 09, 2010, 11:49:01 AM » |
|
Anyone have any speculation on what types of games will be on the test this Saturday?
|
|
|
|
|
Scooter14
Newbie
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2010, 02:48:24 PM » |
|
What do you mean? Isn't that pretty much impossible to speculate about? Or do you mean general trends from recent tests?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lawdog
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2010, 02:58:41 PM » |
|
I bet you can plan on seeing some grouping games w/ conditional reasoning. You could probably rely on seeing some linear and sequencing concepts as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Pheezer
Jr. Member

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 68
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2010, 05:46:50 PM » |
|
I meant kind of what lawdog responded with...what's most likely to appear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSAT Eliminator
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2010, 06:41:49 PM » |
|
Linear and Grouping are the two things that appear the most, so study those two ideas as much as possible. Don't worry about outlier/exotic game types at this point because chances are you won't see one of those.
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Troy
Jr. Member

Karma: 3
Offline
Posts: 91
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2010, 04:52:37 PM » |
|
I've noticed a lot of sequencing on recent exams....that is, closer to pure sequencing than just sequencing rules in linear games. Both June and October had a game that was more or less pure sequencing (no blocks, no specific variable placements...just variables ordered relative to one another). They also seem to be mixing grouping and linearity fairly frequently (game 3 from October is a great example).
Aside from the odd, pattern-ish mulch game in June, 7 of the last 8 games have been:
2 Grouping 2 Sequencing 2 Grouping/Linear Mix (game 1 from June and game 3 from October) 1 Basic Linear
Note: "Sequencing" falls under that Linear category, but I've noted it separately here to draw attention to the fact that there seems to be an emphasis on it of late.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lawdog
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2010, 10:06:28 PM » |
|
 Good points: it does seem like they're putting an increasing amount of effort into mixing distinct concepts like linear and grouping 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerri
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2010, 04:32:04 PM » |
|
Well, it's over! That was interesting. The stained glass and police interview games killed me. I hope that section was the experimental one; otherwise, I'm afraid I'm in trouble. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Pheezer
Jr. Member

Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 68
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2010, 04:41:47 PM » |
|
Well, it's over! That was interesting. The stained glass and police interview games killed me. I hope that section was the experimental one; otherwise, I'm afraid I'm in trouble. Thoughts?
Police interview...was that the 4th game? Same feeling overall. LG = Death
|
|
|
|
|
|
jay
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2010, 04:46:04 PM » |
|
what was in the police game? i dont remember it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2010, 04:50:16 PM » |
|
 Logic Games were Killer. What do you guys think was the experimental section?
|
|
|
|
|
|
greg
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2010, 04:51:18 PM » |
|
 Rather which logic games section do you think was experimental?
|
|
|
|
|
|
jay
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2010, 04:52:59 PM » |
|
did anyone take a logic games section without the stained glass problem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
truemoss
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2010, 04:53:38 PM » |
|
I had RC experimental. Stained glass and Employees/Conferences games were real.
|
|
|
|
|
peregrina
Newbie
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 33
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2010, 05:00:13 PM » |
|
did anyone take a logic games section without the stained glass problem?
Seems like the stained glass game had to be real, and it SUCKED!
|
|
|
|
|
|