|
Elephant
Guest
|
 |
« on: October 09, 2010, 03:13:04 PM » |
|
Anyone have 3 LRs? Anyone know which one was exp?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argh_Pirate
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2010, 03:32:42 PM » |
|
I did as well. I hope the first one (sec 1 for me) was the experimental - it was very hard. I found the 2nd of the 3 very easy and the 3rd to be easy-med.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jenn
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2010, 03:45:06 PM » |
|
i had three also, and i totally agree...hoping the first lr was experimental
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elephant
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2010, 03:51:54 PM » |
|
Me too, but how can we tell? If sec 1 was exp, I'm keeping my score.
|
|
|
|
|
|
candle stick
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2010, 04:07:27 PM » |
|
elephant,
can you remember any specific questions that stood out on the first lr section? there is someone in the other thread that said he will tell us if he had it, if we give him examples
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argh_Pirate
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2010, 04:12:55 PM » |
|
elephant,
can you remember any specific questions that stood out on the first lr section? there is someone in the other thread that said he will tell us if he had it, if we give him examples
Did you guys think that the one with the barn owls question was really hard? I had LR LR RC LR LG the 2nd and 3rd seemed easy but the first LR (at least for me), which I recall asking about barn owls being blinded and it affecting their hearing, was pretty brutal. I also thought that there were a higher % of atypical questions such as how would this argument most likely end and stuff like that that is still fair game but just not that common... thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
mark
Guest
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2010, 04:17:30 PM » |
|
I had 3 LRs also. I agree with you guys, the first one was very tough. The other two were more feasible. Lets hope the first one was the experimental section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mo
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2010, 06:45:49 PM » |
|
I had the same LR LR RC LR LG format...though I am hoping the 2nd one was experimental as Ihad a complete mental lapse in that one....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mo
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2010, 06:58:51 PM » |
|
Anybody remember any other questions from the first LR section? I gonna ask around and see if I can determine which was experimental
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mo
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2010, 07:19:35 PM » |
|
Sorry guys...I just spoke to some guys who had only two LR sections and they definetly remember the Owl question. It wasn't experimental
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chunky
Guest
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2010, 08:06:45 AM » |
|
Sorry guys...I just spoke to some guys who had only two LR sections and they definetly remember the Owl question. It wasn't experimental
Yup, sorry, Owls were not experimental. |
|
|
|
|
|
LSATsucks
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2010, 10:07:09 AM » |
|
I had Owls too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laura
Guest
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2010, 10:56:46 AM » |
|
If anyone had LR-LR-RC-LR-LG... do you remember if the Owl question was in Section 1 or Section 2?
|
|
|
|
|
hellokelly
Jr. Member
Karma: 1
 Offline
Posts: 96
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2010, 11:02:32 AM » |
|
how many LR questions you guys have? confirmed by others who don't have LR experimental?
Why I found info online, someone has 3 25s but someone has 2 26s?
does anyone have one begin with talking about two different definition of right?
someone said I have right to do, blahhh and the conclusion is it's absurd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jessie
Guest
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2010, 01:13:01 PM » |
|
I had RC LR LR - LG LR. Definitely had the owls, but they were in my second LR section/section 3 on the test. From everything I've seen, section 2, regardless of what it was, was experimental.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author
